A Investment forum. InvestmentBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » InvestmentBanter forum » Regional » Australia
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 2nd 14, 12:12 AM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Clocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"

On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?


yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well



Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale, the destructive LNP ****wits are leaving a legacy of a third rate
network which will cost much more to upgrade when we inevitably will
have to do it anyway.


  #12  
Old July 2nd 14, 12:30 AM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Dechucka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"


"Clocky" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?


yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well



Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale, the destructive LNP ****wits are leaving a legacy of a third rate
network which will cost much more to upgrade when we inevitably will have
to do it anyway.


There were/are a lot of problems with the implementation but the vision to
drag us into the 21st century is what was needed. Unfortunately for a
country like Aus this was always going to be a gov. programme as private
enterprise would only ever pick the eyes out of it and further the Capital
city country divide

  #13  
Old July 2nd 14, 07:04 AM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Abusive Liar Party
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"

On 2/07/2014 9:12 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?


yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well



Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale,


How does the NBN allow a farmer to "compete on a global scale"?

Please note that parotting ALP propaganda is not acceptable. Use you
brain and come up with an original answer, that is, if possible.





the destructive LNP ****wits are leaving a legacy of a third rate
network which will cost much more to upgrade when we inevitably will
have to do it anyway.




--
Why we kicked out the ALP:
http://nicholsoncartoons.com.au/labo...-business.html

Bill Shorten, "Oh, yeah, I believe him"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opi...-1226831907309

Australian Liar Party:
"There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead"

"Well certainly what we rejected is this hysterical allegation that
somehow we are moving towards a carbon tax from the Liberals in their
advertising. We certainly reject that"

Labor's speechwriter...
On Gillard:
"She has not much except a kindergarten sandpit response to things"
"One thing is sure - there will be no Gillard era. This is not a 20-year
stretch. Civilised people's hands are already over their faces every
time she speaks. That cannot last. She has no power, no influence, no
friends, no learning. There's not much there"

Latham (after she touched his chest in an interview):
"The physicality of it was all on her side. Iím a happily married man
and this sort of stuff I found a little bit out of the ordinary".

Labornomics:
http://pokiepleasures.com.au/wp-cont...2/08/baee1.jpg

Labor's (overcrowded) sweat shops:
http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/...-1226128924769


Because of Labor:
* Australia is currently paying $1 billion a month in interest;
* Australia would have the fastest growth in *spending* and 3rd fastest
growth in net *debt* of 17 countries profiled by the IMF;
* As a result, without action, Australiaís gross debt would rise to $667
billion, with an interest bill of nearly $3 billion a month

The ALP 'achievements':
1. Six hundred thousand more unemployed
2. Three fewer car manufacturers (3 minus 3 equals zero)
3. A decimated aluminium industry
4. Doubled electricity costs
5. Quarter of a million immigrants without *any* new infrasructure
6. Fourteen thousand plus pages of legislation.
7. Thousands of words of abuse
8. Four deceased apprentices
9. One thousand two hundred drowned asylum seekers
10. A handbag with an affinity for small Asian women
11. A world's greatest treasurer
12. Three huge promises (Gonski, NDIS and health)
13. Cancellation of half of the "$500b investment pipeline"
14. Another stolen generation of Aboriginal kids
15. 1,000 asylum seeker kids in detention
16. 50,000 unwanted, unqualified visa cheats.
17. Two fraud artists - an MP and an ALP national president
18. One paedophile. One convicted, that is.
19. A prime suspect for rape.
Speaking of which:
20. Several seemingly endless investigations
21. A AAA-rated slush fund manager
22. Half a trillion dollars of debt

The ALP's war on money:
http://2.static.australianindependen...?itok=VEJ1S04n

Who squandered the mining boom?
http://www.rba.gov.au/publications/b...ing-graph3.gif

The ALP's war on Australia:
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/?p=4905

The ALP's preference to Gillard...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PguhkVG49To

Labor's legacy:
http://www.laborsmess.com.au/
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/wp-c....-07-08.43.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lePrBUHihKI
http://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/Fil...-quarterly.jpg
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-1...-graph/4694210

"Don't write crap. Can't be that hard. And when you have written
complete crap, then I think you should correct it" - Julia Gillard
http://tinyurl.com/Gillard4Sale

"Socialism or Communism; the first is suicide, the second murder. In the
end you have a dead body either way" - Ayn Rand

#auspol #ausdebate
  #14  
Old July 2nd 14, 07:16 AM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Gordon Levi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 362
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"

Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.


So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that it
would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.


But you said that most people will choose only a mobile connection.
Why would they care about the hype for a connection they are not going
to use?

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?


Even sillier for the government to persist. Why doesn't Turnbull
explain that it will cost $60,000 per home and that most householders
won't want it anyway.
  #15  
Old July 2nd 14, 11:02 PM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Dechucka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"


"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 9:12 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to
make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?

yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well



Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale,


How does the NBN allow a farmer to "compete on a global scale"?

Please note that parotting ALP propaganda is not acceptable. Use you brain
and come up with an original answer, that is, if possible.


An e.g. for you http://tinyurl.com/p66w2wb if you had decent speed you could
do your own internet search, remember Google is your friend

  #16  
Old July 3rd 14, 08:42 PM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Frank Slootweg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 113
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"

Dechucka wrote:

"Clocky" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?

yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well



Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale, the destructive LNP ****wits are leaving a legacy of a third rate
network which will cost much more to upgrade when we inevitably will have
to do it anyway.


There were/are a lot of problems with the implementation but the vision to
drag us into the 21st century is what was needed. Unfortunately for a
country like Aus this was always going to be a gov. programme as private
enterprise would only ever pick the eyes out of it and further the Capital
city country divide


Yes, and that decreasing the capital-city/country divide worked out
*so* well, didn't it!? How much above 0% is the country roll-out now?
  #17  
Old July 3rd 14, 08:42 PM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Frank Slootweg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 113
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"

Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 9:12 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to
make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...


Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close it
down if that's what the majority want.

The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?

yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well

Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale,


How does the NBN allow a farmer to "compete on a global scale"?

Please note that parotting ALP propaganda is not acceptable. Use you brain
and come up with an original answer, that is, if possible.


An e.g. for you http://tinyurl.com/p66w2wb if you had decent speed you could
do your own internet search, remember Google is your friend


Willunga isn't exactly Woop Woop, is it? And *12/1 Mbps*!? You're
joking, right!? So they didn't have a good ADSL setup, big beeping
deal!
  #18  
Old July 3rd 14, 10:29 PM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Dechucka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"


"Frank Slootweg" wrote in message
...
Dechucka wrote:

"Clocky" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will
be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to
make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...



Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close
it
down if that's what the majority want.


The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?

yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well


Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a global
scale, the destructive LNP ****wits are leaving a legacy of a third
rate
network which will cost much more to upgrade when we inevitably will
have
to do it anyway.


There were/are a lot of problems with the implementation but the vision
to
drag us into the 21st century is what was needed. Unfortunately for a
country like Aus this was always going to be a gov. programme as private
enterprise would only ever pick the eyes out of it and further the
Capital
city country divide


Yes, and that decreasing the capital-city/country divide worked out
*so* well, didn't it!? How much above 0% is the country roll-out now?


a goodly percent

  #19  
Old July 3rd 14, 10:30 PM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Dechucka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"


"Frank Slootweg" wrote in message
...
Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 9:12 AM, Clocky wrote:
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

"Abusive Liar Party" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 12:23 AM, Gordon Levi wrote:
Abusive Liar Party wrote:

On 1/07/2014 4:42 PM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 01-Jul-14 3:23 PM, Dechucka wrote:

Those who want need it can use it those that don't can stick
with
what
they have. It's called CHOICE

I'm afraid it isn't.
You don't get a choice.

I have a letter from NBN Co stating that my existing service will
be
permanently switched of on 14 August 2015, and it is up to me to
make
alternative arrangements for my home phone and Internet.

Cheers Don...


Most people will go exclusively mobile and ignore the NBN.

So why is the government persisting with it? They could just close
it
down if that's what the majority want.

The majority want the hype that Labor promised. If you told them
that
it would cost them $10,000 per home, they would not want it.

At 15% take-up it will cost $60,000 per home. Still want it?

yes and of course that is why our trading partners are as well

Yep, now, instead of getting a network that lets us compete on a
global
scale,

How does the NBN allow a farmer to "compete on a global scale"?

Please note that parotting ALP propaganda is not acceptable. Use you
brain
and come up with an original answer, that is, if possible.


An e.g. for you http://tinyurl.com/p66w2wb if you had decent speed you
could
do your own internet search, remember Google is your friend


Willunga isn't exactly Woop Woop, is it? And *12/1 Mbps*!? You're
joking, right!? So they didn't have a good ADSL setup, big beeping
deal!


It was AN e.g. lots of others if you are interested

  #20  
Old July 3rd 14, 10:43 PM posted to aus.politics,aus.comms,aus.invest
Abusive Liar Party
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default "Only 15 per cent of eligible households take up NBN wireless"

On 4/07/2014 5:42 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
Dechucka wrote:

"Clocky" wrote in message
...
On 2/07/2014 6:03 AM, Dechucka wrote:

....

There were/are a lot of problems with the implementation but the vision to
drag us into the 21st century is what was needed. Unfortunately for a
country like Aus this was always going to be a gov. programme as private
enterprise would only ever pick the eyes out of it and further the Capital
city country divide


Yes, and that decreasing the capital-city/country divide worked out
*so* well, didn't it!? How much above 0% is the country roll-out now?


The ALP achieved 100% of their press release quota in only a few months.

The NBNCO home page (gone now) with the green ribbon and the 1950s
USSR-style image with the shiny-eyed bloke going off to work (whilst his
wife stayed at home) was a classic.

And it has come true. Enrolments of women in STEM professions halved
under the ALP. Now we are learning that for some women it is cheaper to
stay at home than to pay for child care (another ALP Passionfinger job).
For someone who had a lot to say about misogyny, Gillard did do much to
help women - she set equality of women back 50 years.

But I digress. Under the ALP, the NBN rollout rate didn't even keep up
with immigration - and, because they were overbuilding places with very
good existing ADSL2 access, like Blacktown, they actually took us
backwards. And I haven't even talked about take up rate!



--
Why we kicked out the ALP:
http://nicholsoncartoons.com.au/labo...-business.html

Bill Shorten, "Oh, yeah, I believe him"
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opi...-1226831907309

Australian Liar Party:
"There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead"

"Well certainly what we rejected is this hysterical allegation that
somehow we are moving towards a carbon tax from the Liberals in their
advertising. We certainly reject that"

Labor's speechwriter...
On Gillard:
"She has not much except a kindergarten sandpit response to things"
"One thing is sure - there will be no Gillard era. This is not a 20-year
stretch. Civilised people's hands are already over their faces every
time she speaks. That cannot last. She has no power, no influence, no
friends, no learning. There's not much there"

Latham (after she touched his chest in an interview):
"The physicality of it was all on her side. Iím a happily married man
and this sort of stuff I found a little bit out of the ordinary".

Labornomics:
http://pokiepleasures.com.au/wp-cont...2/08/baee1.jpg

Labor's (overcrowded) sweat shops:
http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/...-1226128924769


Because of Labor:
* Australia is currently paying $1 billion a month in interest;
* Australia would have the fastest growth in *spending* and 3rd fastest
growth in net *debt* of 17 countries profiled by the IMF;
* As a result, without action, Australiaís gross debt would rise to $667
billion, with an interest bill of nearly $3 billion a month

The ALP 'achievements':
1. Six hundred thousand more unemployed
2. Three fewer car manufacturers (3 minus 3 equals zero)
3. A decimated aluminium industry
4. Doubled electricity costs
5. Quarter of a million immigrants without *any* new infrasructure
6. Fourteen thousand plus pages of legislation.
7. Thousands of words of abuse
8. Four deceased apprentices
9. One thousand two hundred drowned asylum seekers
10. A handbag with an affinity for small Asian women
11. A world's greatest treasurer
12. Three huge promises (Gonski, NDIS and health)
13. Cancellation of half of the "$500b investment pipeline"
14. Another stolen generation of Aboriginal kids
15. 1,000 asylum seeker kids in detention
16. 50,000 unwanted, unqualified visa cheats.
17. Two fraud artists - an MP and an ALP national president
18. One paedophile. One convicted, that is.
19. A prime suspect for rape.
Speaking of which:
20. Several seemingly endless investigations
21. A AAA-rated slush fund manager
22. Half a trillion dollars of debt

The ALP's war on money:
http://2.static.australianindependen...?itok=VEJ1S04n

Who squandered the mining boom?
http://www.rba.gov.au/publications/b...ing-graph3.gif

The ALP's war on Australia:
http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/?p=4905

The ALP's preference to Gillard...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PguhkVG49To

Labor's legacy:
http://www.laborsmess.com.au/
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/wp-c....-07-08.43.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lePrBUHihKI
http://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/Fil...-quarterly.jpg
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-1...-graph/4694210

"Don't write crap. Can't be that hard. And when you have written
complete crap, then I think you should correct it" - Julia Gillard
http://tinyurl.com/Gillard4Sale

"Socialism or Communism; the first is suicide, the second murder. In the
end you have a dead body either way" - Ayn Rand

#auspol #ausdebate
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Households will be $3,800 richer by 2020 thanks to speedy broadband Abusive Liar and Popup Australia 0 September 4th 13 12:12 AM
Crime doesn't pay: "Nielsen poll puts Labor's primary vote below30 per cent" ALP = Arrogrant Liars & Pretenders Australia 0 June 17th 13 01:58 AM
"MORE than 60 per cent of Canberrans regularly have sleepless nights" ALP Fomenting Debt Australia 1 December 1st 12 07:22 PM
Laughable "market" drops 40, it's "oversold," fraudulently "rallies 200, never "overbought" [email protected] Stocks & shares 0 March 21st 07 11:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2019 InvestmentBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.